<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money Matters: Taking an interest in your interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kopi-oh.com/wordpress/2007/11/22/taking-an-interest-in-your-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kopi-oh.com/wordpress/2007/11/22/taking-an-interest-in-your-interest/</link>
	<description>It's about sharing.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 03:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: desmond</title>
		<link>http://www.kopi-oh.com/wordpress/2007/11/22/taking-an-interest-in-your-interest/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>desmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kopi-oh.com/wordpress/2007/11/22/taking-an-interest-in-your-interest/#comment-818</guid>
		<description>singapore will only warrant people's 100% saving till 31st december 2010. after that, the amount that is protected in the bank will be 20k. so does that means anything beyond that the bank can just lose them and don't have to return? this is bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>singapore will only warrant people&#8217;s 100% saving till 31st december 2010. after that, the amount that is protected in the bank will be 20k. so does that means anything beyond that the bank can just lose them and don&#8217;t have to return? this is bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

